[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUh24L34ey3waq-QdJcy9OGAqdxcJXzvaN7FAoi+m4Dww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 22:20:58 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] context_tracking: avoid irq_save/irq_restore on guest
entry and exit
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
> guest_enter and guest_exit must be called with interrupts disabled,
> since they take the vtime_seqlock with write_seq{lock,unlock}.
> Therefore, it is not necessary to check for exceptions, nor to
> save/restore the IRQ state, when context tracking functions are
> called by guest_enter and guest_exit.
>
> Split the body of context_tracking_entry and context_tracking_exit
> out to __-prefixed functions, and use them from KVM.
>
> Rik van Riel has measured this to speed up a tight vmentry/vmexit
> loop by about 2%.
Looks generally sensible. I'm not familiar enough with the code to
call it reviewed-by while sitting on the airport shuttle.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists