linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] dmaengine: tegra-apb: Correct runtime-pm usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151028070345.GF3041@vkoul-mobl.iind.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:03:47 +0900
From:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dmaengine: tegra-apb: Correct runtime-pm usage

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 09:25:52AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> @@ -1182,14 +1182,11 @@ static int tegra_dma_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *dc)
>  {
>  	struct tegra_dma_channel *tdc = to_tegra_dma_chan(dc);
>  	struct tegra_dma *tdma = tdc->tdma;
> -	int ret;
>  
>  	dma_cookie_init(&tdc->dma_chan);
>  	tdc->config_init = false;
> -	ret = clk_prepare_enable(tdma->dma_clk);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		dev_err(tdc2dev(tdc), "clk_prepare_enable failed: %d\n", ret);
> -	return ret;
> +
> +	return pm_runtime_get_sync(tdma->dev);

Alloc channel is supposed to return number of descriptors allocated and if
pm_runtime_get_sync() returns postive values we get wrong return!

>  	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> -	if (!pm_runtime_enabled(&pdev->dev)) {
> +	if (!pm_runtime_enabled(&pdev->dev))
>  		ret = tegra_dma_runtime_resume(&pdev->dev);
> -		if (ret) {
> -			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "dma_runtime_resume failed %d\n",
> -				ret);
> -			goto err_pm_disable;
> -		}
> -	}
> +	else
> +		ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);

do we need pm_runtime_get() here, should we use pm_request_resume() ?

>  static int tegra_dma_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct tegra_dma *tdma = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> -	int i;
> -	int ret;
> +	int i, ret;
>  
>  	/* Enable clock before accessing register */
> -	ret = tegra_dma_runtime_resume(dev);
> +	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);

If you are runtime suspended then core will runtime resume you before
invoking suspend, so why do we need this

-- 
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/