linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/13] rculist: Make list_entry_rcu() use lockless

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151028083353.GA824@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:33:53 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	pranith kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>,
	Patrick Marlier <patrick.marlier@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/13] rculist: Make list_entry_rcu() use
 lockless_dereference()


* Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:

> Subject: writeback: don't use list_entry_rcu() for pointer offsetting in bdi_split_work_to_wbs()
> 
> bdi_split_work_to_wbs() uses list_for_each_entry_rcu_continue() to
> walk @bdi->wb_list.  To set up the initial iteration condition, it
> uses list_entry_rcu() to calculate the entry pointer corresponding to
> the list head; however, this isn't an actual RCU dereference and using
> list_entry_rcu() for it ended up breaking a proposed list_entry_rcu()
> change because it was feeding an non-lvalue pointer into the macro.
> 
> Don't use the RCU variant for simple pointer offsetting.  Use
> list_entry() instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> ---
>  fs/fs-writeback.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index 29e4599..7378169 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -779,8 +779,8 @@ static void bdi_split_work_to_wbs(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
>  				  bool skip_if_busy)
>  {
>  	struct bdi_writeback *last_wb = NULL;
> -	struct bdi_writeback *wb = list_entry_rcu(&bdi->wb_list,
> -						struct bdi_writeback, bdi_node);
> +	struct bdi_writeback *wb = list_entry(&bdi->wb_list,
> +					      struct bdi_writeback, bdi_node);
>  
>  	might_sleep();

Any objections against me applying this fix to tip:core/rcu so that I can push the 
recent RCU changes towards linux-next without triggering a build failure?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/