[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151028115825.GB29512@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:58:25 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>, catalin.marinas@....com,
takahiro.akashi@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, guohanjun@...wei.com,
dingtianhong@...wei.com, zhouchengming1@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] recordmcount: arm64: replace the ignored mcount call
into nop
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:16:19AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:04:05 +0800
> Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> > By now, the recordmcount only records the function that in
> > following sections:
> > .text/.ref.text/.sched.text/.spinlock.text/.irqentry.text/
> > .kprobes.text/.text.unlikely
> >
> > For the function that not in these sections, the call mcount
> > will be in place and not be replaced when kernel boot up. And
> > it will bring performance overhead, such as do_mem_abort (in
> > .exception.text section). This patch make the call mcount to
> > nop for this case in recordmcount.
>
> I can take this in my tree with an Ack from the ARM64 maintainers.
Looks like it does what it says on the tin:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists