[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151028130428.GB5216@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 14:04:28 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/52] perf stat record: Synthesize stat record data
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:42:44AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
SNIP
> This is confusing...
>
> Anyway, now the perf.data file doesn't produce that many confusing
> messages, just one, and the error reporting continues needing a
> newline, oops just noticed another problem:
>
> [root@zoo linux]# perf stat record usleep 1
>
> Performance counter stats for 'usleep 1':
>
> 0.520959 task-clock (msec) # 0.504 CPUs utilized
> 1 context-switches # 0.002 M/sec
> 0 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec
> 51 page-faults # 0.098 M/sec
> 929738 cycles # 1.785 GHz
> 625885 stalled-cycles-frontend # 67.32% frontend cycles idle
> <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
> 634514 instructions # 0.68 insns per cycle
> # 0.99 stalled cycles per insn
> 128859 branches # 247.350 M/sec
> 7602 branch-misses # 5.90% of all branches
>
> 0.001034675 seconds time elapsed
>
> [root@zoo linux]# perf evlist
> non matching sample_type[root@zoo linux]#
will check, thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists