[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151028135922.GA27909@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:59:23 +0000
From: "Busch, Keith" <keith.busch@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, willy@...ux.intel.com,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
aik@...abs.ru, david@...son.dropbear.id.au, hch@...radead.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v3] Fix NVMe driver support on Power with 32-bit DMA
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:54:43PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Busch, Keith" <keith.busch@...el.com>
> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 22:36:43 +0000
>
> > If you're suggesting to compile-time break architectures that currently
> > work just fine with NVMe, let me stop you right there.
>
> Silently "working" without the architecture maintainer having to explicity
> look at the new interface and make sure his platform is implementing it
> properly is an extremely bad practice.
It won't work if it's wrong. It'll BUG_ON, and I'll be assigned to help
fix it, like what's happened here (on a private bugzilla).
The "new" interface for all the other architectures is the same as the
old one we've been using for the last 5 years.
I welcome x86 maintainer feedback to confirm virtual and DMA addresses
have the same offset at 4k alignment, but I have to insist we don't
break my currently working hardware to force their attention.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists