lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <e0470b8c1ef2359f81d3c78534067bff3eb82a0b.1446021555.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 28 Oct 2015 14:53:15 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Aaron Conole <aconole@...heb.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 084/123] net/unix: fix logic about sk_peek_offset

From: Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

[ Upstream commit e9193d60d363e4dff75ff6d43a48f22be26d59c7 ]

Now send with MSG_PEEK can return data from multiple SKBs.

Unfortunately we take into account the peek offset for each skb,
that is wrong. We need to apply the peek offset only once.

In addition, the peek offset should be used only if MSG_PEEK is set.

Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@...heb.org>
Fixes: 9f389e35674f ("af_unix: return data from multiple SKBs on recv() with MSG_PEEK flag")
Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
Tested-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@...heb.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
 net/unix/af_unix.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 39b9429c2c86..157b3595ef62 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -1954,6 +1954,11 @@ static int unix_stream_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	if (flags & MSG_PEEK)
+		skip = sk_peek_offset(sk, flags);
+	else
+		skip = 0;
+
 	do {
 		int chunk;
 		struct sk_buff *skb, *last;
@@ -2000,7 +2005,6 @@ again:
 			break;
 		}
 
-		skip = sk_peek_offset(sk, flags);
 		while (skip >= unix_skb_len(skb)) {
 			skip -= unix_skb_len(skb);
 			last = skb;
@@ -2062,14 +2066,12 @@ again:
 			if (UNIXCB(skb).fp)
 				siocb->scm->fp = scm_fp_dup(UNIXCB(skb).fp);
 
-			if (skip) {
-				sk_peek_offset_fwd(sk, chunk);
-				skip -= chunk;
-			}
+			sk_peek_offset_fwd(sk, chunk);
 
 			if (UNIXCB(skb).fp)
 				break;
 
+			skip = 0;
 			last = skb;
 			unix_state_lock(sk);
 			skb = skb_peek_next(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
-- 
2.6.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ