linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.12 022/123] perf header: Fixup reading of HEADER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <bb37a2ec9ac66f7dbf181a59abc495f47dc2c5b9.1446021555.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 28 Oct 2015 14:50:39 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 022/123] perf header: Fixup reading of HEADER_NRCPUS feature

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit caa470475d9b59eeff093ae650800d34612c4379 upstream.

The original patch introducing this header wrote the number of CPUs available
and online in one order and then swapped those values when reading, fix it.

Before:

  # perf record usleep 1
  # perf report --header-only | grep 'nrcpus \(online\|avail\)'
  # nrcpus online : 4
  # nrcpus avail : 4
  # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/online
  # perf record usleep 1
  # perf report --header-only | grep 'nrcpus \(online\|avail\)'
  # nrcpus online : 4
  # nrcpus avail : 3
  # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
  # perf record usleep 1
  # perf report --header-only | grep 'nrcpus \(online\|avail\)'
  # nrcpus online : 4
  # nrcpus avail : 2

After the fix, bringing back the CPUs online:

  # perf report --header-only | grep 'nrcpus \(online\|avail\)'
  # nrcpus online : 2
  # nrcpus avail : 4
  # echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/online
  # perf record usleep 1
  # perf report --header-only | grep 'nrcpus \(online\|avail\)'
  # nrcpus online : 3
  # nrcpus avail : 4
  # echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
  # perf record usleep 1
  # perf report --header-only | grep 'nrcpus \(online\|avail\)'
  # nrcpus online : 4
  # nrcpus avail : 4

Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Fixes: fbe96f29ce4b ("perf tools: Make perf.data more self-descriptive (v8)")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150911153323.GP23511@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
 tools/perf/util/header.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c
index c3e5a3b817ab..3f82a2f65a65 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c
@@ -1718,7 +1718,7 @@ static int process_nrcpus(struct perf_file_section *section __maybe_unused,
 	if (ph->needs_swap)
 		nr = bswap_32(nr);
 
-	ph->env.nr_cpus_online = nr;
+	ph->env.nr_cpus_avail = nr;
 
 	ret = readn(fd, &nr, sizeof(nr));
 	if (ret != sizeof(nr))
@@ -1727,7 +1727,7 @@ static int process_nrcpus(struct perf_file_section *section __maybe_unused,
 	if (ph->needs_swap)
 		nr = bswap_32(nr);
 
-	ph->env.nr_cpus_avail = nr;
+	ph->env.nr_cpus_online = nr;
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.6.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/