[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151028153707.GB22672@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:37:07 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, nbd-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] kthread: introduce kthread_get_run() to fix
__nbd_ioctl()
On 10/26, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 03:27:13PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > It is not safe to use the task_struct returned by kthread_run(threadfn)
> > if threadfn() can exit before the "owner" does kthread_stop(), nothing
> > protects this task_struct.
> >
> > So __nbd_ioctl() looks buggy; a killed nbd_thread_send() can exit, free
> > its task_struct, and then kthread_stop() can use the freed/reused memory.
> >
> > Add the new trivial helper, kthread_get_run(). Hopefully it will have more
> > users, this patch changes __nbd_ioctl() as an example.
>
> This looks horrible.
Do you mean the helper itself?
In fact iirc people asked for this helper before. It looks natural and simple.
kthread_run() can only be used if this kthread can't exit on its own.
> I think the real problem is that nbd is totally
> abusing signals for kthreads and that needs to go away.
I agree this code needs cleanups. And of course we can fix it without
new helper, but see above.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists