[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151028144655.GC3716@ubuntu>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:16:55 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/5] cpufreq: governor: Quit work-handlers early if
governor is stopped
On 28-10-15, 16:12, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> So this is a changelog matching your patch:
>
> "gov_queue_work() acquires cpufreq_governor_lock to allow cpufreq_governor_stop()
> to drain delayed work items possibly scheduled on CPUs that share the policy with
> a CPU being taken offline.
>
> However, the same goal may be achieved in a more straightforward way if the
> policy pointer in the struct cpu_dbs_info matching the policy CPU is reset
> upfront by cpufreq_governor_stop() under the timer_mutex belonging to it and
> checked against NULL, under the same lock, at the beginning of dbs_timer().
>
> In that case every instance of dbs_timer() run for a struct cpu_dbs_info
> sharing the policy pointer in question after cpufreq_governor_stop() has started
> will notice that that pointer is NULL and bail out immediately without queuing up
> any new work items. In turn, gov_cancel_work() called by cpufreq_governor_stop()
> before destroying timer_mutex will wait for all of the delayed work items
> currently running on the CPUs sharing the policy to drop the mutex, so it may
> be destroyed safely.
>
> Make cpufreq_governor_stop() and dbs_timer() work as described and modify
> gov_queue_work() so it does not acquire cpufreq_governor_lock any more."
Looks far better, thanks :)
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists