lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:11:14 +0100 From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de> To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>, Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>, Josh Wu <josh.wu@...el.com>, Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>, Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>, Han Xu <han.xu@...escale.com>, Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@....com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mtd: ofpart: grab device tree node directly from master device node On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 08:58:13 AM, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi Brian, Hi, [...] > > Are > > there ever cases we want more than one (master) MTD per nand_chip? Or > > vice versa? > > Nope, I'd say that you always have a 1:1 relationship between a master > MTD device and a NAND device. Do some sorts of chipselects come into play here ? Ie. you can have one master with multiple NAND chips connected to it. Best regards, Marek Vasut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists