[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1446054996.2757.139.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:56:36 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, k.kozlowski.k@...il.com,
wsa@...-dreams.de, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
broonie@...nel.org, ben-linux@...ff.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] get_maintainer: Add subsystem to reviewer output
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 17:49 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 17:22 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > > > It'd be better if you could add a "tested-by:" instead.
> > >
> > > Patch works as expected:
> > > Tested-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > []
> > > "I'm sure we can make the output even more similar by listing
> > > the MAINTAINERS tag after "reviewer" too."
> >
> > I guess we'll disagree on that one too.
>
> You just happened to think of it a few hours after I mentioned it.
Nope, it seems a maintainers tag is what Krzysztof was suggesting
with his "supported reviewer" bit.
I added the subsystem name.
An issue for that will be how multiple subsystem section matching
affects the output for reviewers who are also maintainers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists