lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56311004.6090809@amd.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:12:20 -0500
From:	Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
To:	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	<rjw@...ysocki.net>, <lenb@...nel.org>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	<will.deacon@....com>
CC:	<thomas.lendacky@....com>, <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
	<hanjun.guo@...aro.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 7/8] PCI: OF: Move of_pci_dma_configure() to
 pci_dma_configure()

Hi Hanjun,

On 10/24/15 02:44, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Suravee,
>
> Some minor comments  below:
>
> On 2015/10/21 23:52, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> [...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> index eea8b42..09264f8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> @@ -6,12 +6,14 @@
>>   #include <linux/delay.h>
>>   #include <linux/init.h>
>>   #include <linux/pci.h>
>> -#include <linux/of_pci.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>
> Seems it's needed for GICv2m patch but not this one?
This one is needed since we are making use of the new of_dma_configure 
instead of the of_pci_dma_configure.

>
>>   #include <linux/pci_hotplug.h>
>>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>>   #include <linux/module.h>
>>   #include <linux/cpumask.h>
>>   #include <linux/pci-aspm.h>
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>
> I think acpi.h should be introduced by the next patch.
You are right. I'll update this one.

>
>> +#include <linux/property.h>
>
> And property.h is also not needed for this patch set.

You are right. I'll remove this

Thanks,
Suravee


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ