[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151028015323.GZ28319@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:53:23 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, lee.jones@...aro.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] drivers/rtc/rtc-s5m.c: add support for S2MPS15 RTC
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:29:56AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> If that's true, then don't add new compatibles, new names etc. Re-use.
> No new code needed, no changes needed. Keep it simple.
Well, it depends - it can be useful to get the information about it
being a different part into DT so that if in future we realise that
there is some difference (perhaps a bug workaround even if the IP is
intended to be the same). Though in the case of a MFD that information
can be obtained from the MFD for the device.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists