[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <563121D5.4030601@imgtec.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 12:28:21 -0700
From: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@...tec.com>
To: Alex Smith <alex@...x-smith.me.uk>
CC: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@...tec.com>,
linux-mips <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
Alex Smith <alex.smith@...tec.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v3, 3/3] MIPS: VDSO: Add implementations of gettimeofday() and
clock_gettime()
On 10/28/2015 12:04 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On 28 October 2015 at 18:57, Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@...tec.com> wrote:
>>
> As I've explained the VDSO will only use the CP0 counter in the same
> situations that the kernel would when it is the active clocksource.
> Any issue that makes the counter unreliable affects the kernel as well
> and is unrelated to the VDSO, so a fix does not belong in this patch.
What would you do if some SoC with different type of cores will define
CPU1 etc CP0_COUNT as a DIFFERENT clocksource from CPU0 (because of
frequency etc)? Timekeeping can select CPU0 clocksource but code still
uses a local CPU1 CP0_COUNT for gettimeofday().
And this kind of solution is the first in line to have an accurate
timing in systems without GIC and with different clock frequencies.
- Leonid
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists