[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151029104844.GA10327@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:48:44 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Marion & Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] TPM: Avoid reference to potentially freed
memory
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 07:12:01AM +0100, Marion & Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>
>
> Le 27/10/2015 11:27, Jarkko Sakkinen a écrit :
> >On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:37:33AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >>On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:32:41PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> >>>Reference to the 'np' node is dropped before dereferencing the 'sizep' and
> >>>'basep' pointers, which could by then point to junk if the node has been
> >>>freed.
> >>>
> >>>Refactor code to call 'of_node_pup' later.
> >>>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> >>LGTM.
> >Is there anyone able to provide Tested-by for this?
> >
> >Christophe, were you able to reproduce the crash (insmod/rmmod couple
> >of times maybe?) and validate that it was gone after fixing the bug?
>
> Hi,
> no, I never triggered the bug.
> This is just something noticed while looking at potential issues related to
> incorrect use of 'of_node_pup'.
> I only compile tested the patch.
The fix is so obvious that I see no reason not to include it. Thanks for
the good work.
> Best regards,
> CJ
/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists