[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZm-kHoiD9EiNHrmv96wKverd63YE9SAfxiOyjnUNe2Gw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:11:48 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nicolassaenzj@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: add tps65218 gpio driver
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Nicolas Saenz Julienne
<nicolassaenzj@...il.com> wrote:
> Driver for the GPIO block found in ti's tps65218 pmics.
>
> The device has two GPIOs and one GPO pin which can be configured as follows:
> GPIO1:
> -general-purpose, open-drain output controlled by GPO1 user bit and/or
> sequencer
> -DDR3 reset input signal from SOC. Signal is either latched or
> passed-trough to GPO2 pin. See below for details.
> GPO2:
> -general-purpose output controlled by GPO2 user bit
> -DDR3 reset output signal. Signal is controlled by GPIO1 and PGOOD.
> See below for details.
> -Output buffer can be configured as open-drain or push-pull.
> GPIO3:
> -general-purpose, open-drain output controlled by GPO3 user bit and/or
> sequencer
> -reset input-signal for DCDC1 and DCDC2.
>
> The input configurations are not meant to be used by the user so the driver
> only offers GPOs.
>
> v2: Added request routine that evaluates the fw config flags and removed module
> owner
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nicolassaenzj@...il.com>
(...)
(Attend to the mail robot's comments)
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
Should be <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/tps65218.h>
> +#include "gpiolib.h"
> +
> +struct tps65218_gpio {
> + struct tps65218 *tps65218;
> + struct gpio_chip gpio_chip;
> +};
> +
> +#define to_tg(gc) container_of(gc, struct tps65218_gpio, gpio_chip)
Use a static inline function for this instead.
> +static int tps65218_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
> +{
> + struct tps65218_gpio *tps65218_gpio = to_tg(gc);
> + struct tps65218 *tps65218 = tps65218_gpio->tps65218;
> + unsigned int val;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = tps65218_reg_read(tps65218, TPS65218_REG_ENABLE2, &val);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return val & (TPS65218_ENABLE2_GPIO1 << offset);
Clamp to bool:
return !!(val & (TPS65218_ENABLE2_GPIO1 << offset));
> +static int tps65218_gpio_output(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset,
> + int value)
> +{
> + /* Only drives GPOs */
> + return 0;
> +}
So shouldn't you implement a .set_direction() callback that will fail if
the user tries to set a line as input?
> +static int tps65218_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
> +{
> + struct tps65218_gpio *tps65218_gpio = to_tg(gc);
> + struct tps65218 *tps65218 = tps65218_gpio->tps65218;
> + unsigned long flags = gc->desc->flags;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (flags & FLAG_OPEN_SOURCE) {
> + dev_err(gc->dev, "can't work as open source\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
This requires Laurent's recent patches I guess.
> +static struct gpio_chip template_chip = {
> + .label = "gpio-tps65218",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .request = tps65218_gpio_request,
> + .direction_output = tps65218_gpio_output,
> + .get = tps65218_gpio_get,
> + .set = tps65218_gpio_set,
> + .can_sleep = true,
> + .ngpio = 3,
> + .base = -1,
> +};
As mentioned you need to implement .set_direction() and fail
to set any line as input.
Apart from this it looks very nice.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists