[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1446133259.3274.52.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:40:59 +0100
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: YH Huang <yh.huang@...iatek.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pwm-backlight: fix the panel power sequence
Hi YH,
Am Donnerstag, den 22.10.2015, 23:12 +0800 schrieb YH Huang:
> In the case of the panel disabled by the bootloader,
> your patch still has the following code and always enables the backlight
> in the probe function.
> pb->enable_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "enable",
> - GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
You are right.
> What do you think if I remove these two lines in my patch?
> if (pb->enable_gpio)
> gpiod_direction_output(pb->enable_gpio, 0);
That won't work if the gpio is still configured as input. How about I
add the GPIOD_ASIS change to my patch you remove that and the above from
yours?
best regards
Philipp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists