linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] media: pxa_camera: fix the buffer free path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 29 Oct 2015 17:01:17 +0100 (CET)
From:	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
To:	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
cc:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] media: pxa_camera: fix the buffer free path

Hi Robert,

On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:

> Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de> writes:
> 
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > Didn't you tell me, that your dmaengine patch got rejected and therefore 
> > these your patches were on hold?
> They were reverted, and then revamped into DMA_CTRL_REUSE, upstreamed and
> merged, as in the commit 272420214d26 ("dmaengine: Add DMA_CTRL_REUSE"). I'd
> 
> Of course a pending fix is still underway
> (http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?12,1318680). But that shouldn't stop us
> from reviewing to get ready to merge.
> 
> I want this serie to be ready, so that as soon as Vinod merges the fix, I can
> ping you to trigger the merge into your tree, without doing (and waiting)
> additional review cycles.

Thanks, understand now. As we discussed before, correct me if I am wrong, 
this is your hobby project. PXA270 is a legacy platform, nobody except you 
is interested in this work. I have nothing against hobby projects and I 
want to support them as much as I can, but I hope you'll understand, that 
I don't have too much free time, so I cannot handle such projects with a 
high priority. I understand your desire to process these patches ASAP, 
however, I'd like to try to minimise my work too. So, I can propose the 
following: let us wait, until your PXA dmaengine patches are _indeed_ in 
the mainline. Then you test your camera patches on top of that tree again, 
perform any eventually necessary updates and either let me know, that 
either your last version is ok and I can now review it, or submit a new 
version, that _works_ on top of then current tree.

Thanks
Guennadi

> Cheers.
> 
> --
> Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/