[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151029021337.GA27115@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:13:37 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Patrick Marlier <patrick.marlier@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
pranith kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/13] rculist: Make list_entry_rcu() use
lockless_dereference()
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:00:30PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >Any objections against me applying this fix to tip:core/rcu so that I can push the
> > >recent RCU changes towards linux-next without triggering a build failure?
> >
> > No objection on my side but probably you are waiting for an ack from
> > somebody else.
>
> I am guessing that he was asking Tejun, but just for the record, I am
> OK with it as well:
>
> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Oops, sorry, for some reason I thought Ingo was asking someone else.
The patch already got applied but yes routing it through -tip sounds
good.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists