linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: i2c: mark also subdirectories as maintained

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:15:53 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: i2c: mark also subdirectories as maintained

On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 16:52 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > +	   The scripts/get_maintainer.pl tool has a quirk about subdirectories.
> > +	   If the file pattern is for a directory, then any subdirectories of
> > +	   the parent directory should also be specified.  For instance:
> > +		F:	drivers/i2c/
> > +		F:	drivers/i2c/*/
> > +	   Otherwise, the scripts/get_maintainer.pl tool by default will use
> > +	   git history to add additional people that have "Signed-off-by:"
> > +	   style signatures on commits to files in those subdirectories.
> 
> I'd be fine with the change. The patch description should probably state
> why fixing the tool is not worth it.

Not worth it vs inappropriate (arch/arm, etc...)

Maybe the wording around "quirk" could be improved or expanded.

Any suggestions?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/