[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcydcgrwPeUY1=Mv_417x1ysL-DAWOYUfpRG7uavYGNig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 23:22:50 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
James Bottomley <JBottomley@...n.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] lib/string_helpers.c: don't lose precision in string_get_size()
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com> wrote:
> string_get_size() loses precision when there is a remainder for
> blk_size / divisor[units] and size is big enough. E.g
> string_get_size(8192, 4096, STRING_UNITS_10, ...) returns "32.7 MB"
> while it is supposed to return "33.5 MB". For some artificial inputs
> the result can be ridiculously wrong, e.g.
> string_get_size(3000, 1900, STRING_UNITS_10, ...) returns "3.00 MB"
> when "5.70 MB" is expected.
>
> The issues comes from the fact than we through away
> blk_size / divisor[units] remainder when size is > exp. This can be fixed
> by saving it and doing some non-trivial calculations later to fix the error
> but that would make this function even more cumbersome. Slightly re-factor
> the function to not lose the precision for all inputs.
>
> The overall complexity of this function comes from the fact that size can
> be huge and we don't want to do size * blk_size as it can overflow. Do the
> math in two steps:
> 1) Reduce size to something < U64_MAX / blk_size.
> 2) Multiply the result by blk_size and do final calculations.
>
> Suggested-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
One nitpick below.
> /*
> - * size must be strictly greater than exp here to ensure that remainder
> - * is greater than divisor[units] coming out of the if below.
> + * size can be huge and doing size * blk_size right away can overflow.
> + * As a first step reduce huge size to something less than
> + * U64_MAX / blk_size.
> */
> - if (size > exp) {
> - remainder = do_div(size, divisor[units]);
> - remainder *= blk_size;
> - i++;
> - } else {
> - remainder *= size;
> + while (size > div_u64(U64_MAX, blk_size)) {
> + /*
> + * We do not need to keep the remainder as blk_size is capped
> + * by U32_MAX and we'll still have enough precision after the
> + * loop.
> + */
> + do_div(size, divisor[units]);
> + ++i;
You may leave i++; here. Any reason not to do that?
> }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists