linux-kernel - [PATCH] PM / OPP: Protect updates to list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <5f8fac4ad84716ef68fc50ab0b78e11ad2837524.1446205160.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date:	Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:26:06 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, mturquette@...libre.com
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list),
	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Protect updates to list_dev with mutex

dev_opp_list_lock is used everywhere to protect device and OPP lists,
but dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() is missed somehow. And instead we used
rcu-lock, which wouldn't help here as we are adding a new list_dev.

This also fixes a problem where we have called kzalloc(..., GFP_KERNEL)
from within rcu-lock, which isn't allowed as kzalloc can sleep when
called with GFP_KERNEL.

With CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP set, we will see the caller vomiting.

Fixes: 8d4d4e98acd6 ("PM / OPP: Add helpers for initializing CPU OPPs")
Reported-by: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
Mike: Can you please verify if this fixes it for you..

 drivers/base/power/opp/core.c | 2 +-
 drivers/base/power/opp/cpu.c  | 8 ++++----
 drivers/base/power/opp/opp.h  | 3 +++
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
index d5c1149ff123..69f83cbe37b2 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
  */
 static LIST_HEAD(dev_opp_list);
 /* Lock to allow exclusive modification to the device and opp lists */
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(dev_opp_list_lock);
+DEFINE_MUTEX(dev_opp_list_lock);
 
 #define opp_rcu_lockdep_assert()					\
 do {									\
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/cpu.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/cpu.c
index 7654c5606307..91f15b2e25ee 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp/cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/cpu.c
@@ -124,12 +124,12 @@ int dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus(struct device *cpu_dev, cpumask_var_t cpumask)
 	struct device *dev;
 	int cpu, ret = 0;
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
+	mutex_lock(&dev_opp_list_lock);
 
 	dev_opp = _find_device_opp(cpu_dev);
 	if (IS_ERR(dev_opp)) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
-		goto out_rcu_read_unlock;
+		goto unlock;
 	}
 
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask) {
@@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ int dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus(struct device *cpu_dev, cpumask_var_t cpumask)
 			continue;
 		}
 	}
-out_rcu_read_unlock:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
+unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&dev_opp_list_lock);
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/opp.h b/drivers/base/power/opp/opp.h
index dcb38f78dae4..7366b2aa8997 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp/opp.h
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/opp.h
@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
 #include <linux/rculist.h>
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 
+/* Lock to allow exclusive modification to the device and opp lists */
+extern struct mutex dev_opp_list_lock;
+
 /*
  * Internal data structure organization with the OPP layer library is as
  * follows:
-- 
2.6.2.198.g614a2ac

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/