[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5927653.jpoZ2K5FqB@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 13:45:08 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc: Tina Ruchandani <ruchandani.tina@...il.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
y2038@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3] scsi: stex: Remove use of struct timeval
On Friday 30 October 2015 12:58:33 Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > @@ -1076,7 +1069,7 @@ static int stex_ss_handshake(struct st_hba *hba)
> > h->req_cnt = cpu_to_le16(hba->rq_count+1);
> > h->status_sz = cpu_to_le16(sizeof(struct status_msg));
> > h->status_cnt = cpu_to_le16(hba->sts_count+1);
> > - stex_gettime(&h->hosttime);
> > + h->hosttime = cpu_to_le64(ktime_get_real_seconds());
> > h->partner_type = HMU_PARTNER_TYPE;
> > h->extra_offset = h->extra_size = 0;
> > scratch_size = (hba->sts_count+1)*sizeof(u32);
> >
> Just remove 'hosttime' altogether. It serves no purpose whatsoever.
>
>
Are you sure? It is defined in a struct that is shared with the HBA
as part of hba->dma_mem, so unless you have access to the firmware,
it's hard to guess what it might be used for inside of the firmware.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists