[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1446212931.20657.161.camel@hpe.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 07:48:51 -0600
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: tony.luck@...el.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 UPDATE-2 3/3] ACPI/APEI/EINJ: Allow memory error
injection to NVDIMM
On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 10:40 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 03:22:24PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > @@ -545,10 +545,15 @@ static int einj_error_inject(u32 type, u32 flags, u64
> > param1, u64 param2,
> > /*
> > * Disallow crazy address masks that give BIOS leeway to pick
> > * injection address almost anywhere. Insist on page or
> > - * better granularity and that target address is normal RAM.
> > + * better granularity and that target address is normal RAM or
> > + * NVDIMM.
> > */
> > - pfn = PFN_DOWN(param1 & param2);
> > - if (!page_is_ram(pfn) || ((param2 & PAGE_MASK) != PAGE_MASK))
> > + base_addr = param1 & param2;
> > + size = (~param2) + 1;
>
> Hmm, I missed this last time: why are the brackets there?
>
> AFAIK, bitwise NOT has a higher precedence than addition.
Yes, the brackets are not necessary. I put them as self-explanatory of the
precedence. Shall I remove them, and send you an updated patch?
Thanks,
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists