linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151030165157.GX4058@x1>
Date:	Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:51:57 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag

On Thu, 29 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:

> Hello Lee,
> 
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <k.kozlowski@...sung.com> wrote:
> > On 28.10.2015 23:38, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >>> They are not maintainers according to your definition of maintainer
> >>> that doesn't seem what most people agree with.
> >>
> >> "most people" so far are 3 people that I assume still want to be
> >> Maintainers despite not actually conducting Maintainer duties, but
> >> are rather Reviewers.  I also have 2 Acks for this patch, so thus far
> >> that's 3 that agree and 3 that do not.  Unsurprisingly the ones that
> >> agree are Maintainers and the ones who are not are (by my definition)
> >> Reviewers -- go figure.
> >>
> >
> > I am not sure on which side you put me finally. :)
> > If there is a consensus among some more experienced developers that
> > maintainer means branch and patches maintaining, then I won't see any
> > problem with the patch nor with switching Samsung PMIC entries to review.
> >
> > In that case, that would be:
> > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> >
> 
> Same for me, what I don't want is to have different meanings per
> subsystems of what maintainers and reviewers mean since that could
> confuse developers posting patches.
> 
> But if there is a kernel wide consensus and all subsystems entries are
> going to be updated to use the same semantics and list as Reviewer to
> people that don't keep git trees, then I'm OK with this patch and you
> can add my:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>

Thanks Javier, but I'm going to drop this patch.

I can see it causing more issues than it'll solve.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/