[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Ve_7NeyJD==EpgzKes9n9wb5oTwtNt7FvZHUSUxqZ4+=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 20:18:49 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
dmaengine <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, timur@...eaurora.org,
cov@...eaurora.org, jcm@...hat.com,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma: add Qualcomm Technologies HIDMA management driver
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> The ACPI tables DSDT and CSRT (more info here:
>> http://www.acpi.info/links.htm) defines properties.
>>
>> DSDT:
>> per DMAC: the resources
>> per client: FixedDMA descriptor that contains channel / request line
>> pair.
>>
>> CSRT:
>> necessary table to map which DMAC provides which request line, thus
>> request line numbering are global on platform.
>>
>> When DMAC driver is probed in the running system it should call as
>> well registration function from acpi-dma.c.
>>
>> All clients when use new DMA slave API gets channel automatically
>> based on their FixedDMA property.
>>
>> So, above is how it should be done. Didn't actually checked what this
>> driver does.
>>
> I was going to reply to all the questions in one pass but let me handle
> piece by piece.
>
> Here are some facts.
> - This hardware supports memcpy and memset only.
> - Memset feature was removed from the kernel sometime around 3.14. So no
> memset support in this driver either.
> - The hardware does not support DMA slave support
> - The goal is to provide an interface to DMA engine framework for memcpy
> optimization so that the rest of the kernel drivers and applications make
> use of the hardware.
>
> CSRT is an Intel specific ACPI table for slave devices.
Wrong.
It was designed by Microsoft to support multiple controllers, in
particular DMACs.
Have you read that document I posted link to?
> It was decided by
> Linaro that CSRT will not be supported for ARM64.
Interesting, ARM64 platforms are not going to have more than one DMAC
per system?
> There were some discussions in ACPI forums to define a similar table for
> ARM64 but we are not there today and this hardware does not support slave
> interface.
>
> ACPI enumeration is just like any other platform device. The driver gets
> looked up by a QCOM specific HID and the driver gets probed with the rest of
> the arguments in DSM object similar to device-tree attributes. The code uses
> device functions so the driver is not aware of where the parameters are
> coming from.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists