[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcYBcG5uFgCDnv3MeQEXbPaWF3z7bvDauWZ8vYA_O32jA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 21:05:58 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...el.com>,
"Puustinen, Ismo" <ismo.puustinen@...el.com>,
"Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 13:18 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > There is a board in the wild, i.e. Intel Galileo Gen2, that has ACPI
>> > enumerated
>> > devices behind I2C bus.
>>
>> Lee, since Wolfram is going to apply patches 1 and 5, how could we
>> proceed with the rest? Patches are indeed build independent, though
>> they are unified by enabling logically piece-by-piece. It would be
>> great if you think you may apply them to your v4.4 queue.
>
> So we're just waiting for Thierry's Ack now, right?
That's right. Either Ack, or he might apply patch by himself. It
wouldn't be harmful in any case.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists