[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5632ED1C.7050500@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:07:56 -0400
From: Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>
To: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
arnd@...db.de, will.deacon@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
rjw@...ysocki.net, hanjun.guo@...aro.org, Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com
CC: jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com, robert.richter@...iumnetworks.com,
Narinder.Dhillon@...iumnetworks.com, ddaney@...iumnetworks.com,
Liviu.Dudau@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, wangyijing@...wei.com,
Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com, msalter@...hat.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 00/11] MMCONFIG refactoring and ARM64 PCI hostbridge
init based on ACPI
Hi Tomasz,
Thanks for posting this series.
On 10/27/2015 12:38 PM, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> From the functionality point of view this series might be split into two logic parts:
> 1. Making MMCONFIG code arch-agnostic which allows all architectures to collect
> PCI config regions and used when necessary.
> 2. Using generic MMCONFIG code and introducing ACPI based PCI hostbridge
> initialization for ARM64
Can I confirm that the intention here is that this replaces Hanjun's
previous patch series? Here's the previous one we were tracking:
https://lkml.kernel.org/g/1432644564-24746-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org
Assuming that is the case, then we will ping a number of folks to
conduct testing and provide acks (this has already been discussed in a
number of conversations with semiconductors over the past few days).
Thanks,
Jon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists