[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1446324424.4060.1.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2015 07:47:04 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, yinghai@...nel.org
Cc: khalid.aziz@...cle.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
weiyang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux@....tj, wangyijing@...wei.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/61] PCI: Resource allocation cleanup for v4.4
On Sat, 2015-10-31 at 14:51 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> This is the way OF seems to work.
>
> It maps all of the ROMs essentially to the same address range, but
> only enables one at a time as it inspects the ROMs and builds the
> device tree during power-on.
>
> Then it makes sure all of them are disabled, and can therefore use
> some of that address range for mapping other BARs.
>
> So if ROMs are disabled, you cannot put the address of such ROMs BAR
> in the kernel's assigned PCI address resource list.
>
> I hope that is what you are doing?
I've seen that sort of stuff on x86 as well. Possibly on POWER, I don't
remember for sure.
I've also seen the VBIOS of some cards manually remap the ROM BAR to
cover BAR 0, extract stuff from it, then disable it.
I think the ROM BAR must be treated as "special". It should probably
done in a separate pass from all the other BARs of all the other
adapters to be honest, and remapped if there's any conflict.
Cheers,
Ben
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists