lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM2PR0301MB1232168A13870D8B448C88A6AB2E0@DM2PR0301MB1232.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Sat, 31 Oct 2015 21:59:44 +0000
From:	Jake Oshins <jakeo@...rosoft.com>
To:	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>, Robo Bot <apw@...onical.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
	"tglx@...hat.com" <tglx@...hat.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
	"marc.zyngier@....com" <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 5/7] PCI: irqdomain: Look up IRQ domain by
 fwnode_handle

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Shevchenko [mailto:andy.shevchenko@...il.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 2:44 PM
> To: Jake Oshins <jakeo@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>; KY Srinivasan
> <kys@...rosoft.com>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> devel@...uxdriverproject.org; olaf@...fle.de; Robo Bot
> <apw@...onical.com>; Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>;
> tglx@...hat.com; Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>;
> marc.zyngier@....com; Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>; linux-
> pci@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] PCI: irqdomain: Look up IRQ domain by
> fwnode_handle
> 
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:11 PM,  <jakeo@...rosoft.com> wrote:
> > From: Jake Oshins <jakeo@...rosoft.com>
> >
> > This patch adds a second way of finding an IRQ domain associated with
> > a root PCI bus.  After looking to see if one can be found through
> > the OF tree, it attempts to look up the IRQ domain through an
> > fwnode_handle stored in the pci_sysdata struct.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jake Oshins <jakeo@...rosoft.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h |  4 +++-
> >  drivers/pci/probe.c        | 11 +++++++++++
> >  include/asm-generic/pci.h  |  4 ++++
> >  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> > index 10213a1..fb74453 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> > @@ -45,11 +45,13 @@ static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus
> *bus)
> >  #endif
> >
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
> > -static inline void *pci_fwnode(struct pci_bus *bus)
> > +static inline void *_pci_root_bus_fwnode(struct pci_bus *bus)
> 
> I'm sorry what is the point to rename?
> 

I renamed it only because Gerry asked me to rename it.  And then I regenerated the patch series with that rename still in the queue, which was a mistake.  The whole thing is introduced in the previous patch.  pci_fwnode() doesn't exist without this patch series.  I'll straighten that out.


> >  {
> >         struct pci_sysdata *sd = bus->sysdata;
> >         return sd->fwnode;
> >  }
> > +
> > +#define pci_root_bus_fwnode    _pci_root_bus_fwnode
> >  #endif
> >
> >  /* Can be used to override the logic in pci_scan_bus for skipping
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > index f441d1b..60e50a8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > @@ -671,6 +671,17 @@ static struct irq_domain
> *pci_host_bridge_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
> >          */
> >         d = pci_host_bridge_of_msi_domain(bus);
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
> > +       /*
> > +        * If no IRQ domain was found via the OF tree, try looking it up
> > +        * directly through the fwnode_handle.
> > +        */
> > +       if (!d && pci_root_bus_fwnode(bus)) {
> > +               d = irq_find_matching_fwnode(pci_root_bus_fwnode(bus),
> > +                                            DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI);
> 
> Gave a second glance and now noticed that you call
> pci_root_bus_fwnode() twice. So, it actually might be more readable
> like your first but modified variant:
> 
> if (!d) {
>   void *fwnode = pci_fwnode(bus);
> 
>   if (fwnode)
>     d = irq_find_matching_fwnode(fwnode, DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI);
> }
> 
> > +       }
> > +#endif
> > +
> >         return d;
> >  }
> 
> 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko

Sure.  No problem.  I'll resend.

-- Jake

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ