[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36DF59CE26D8EE47B0655C516E9CE64028662059@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2015 16:49:40 +0000
From: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
To: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
CC: "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@...nel.org>, 'Pavel Machek' <pavel@....cz>,
"'Kristen Carlson Accardi'" <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [v4] x86, suspend: Save/restore extra MSR registers for
suspend
Hi, Doug,
Sorry for my late response, and thanks for your information:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Smythies [mailto:dsmythies@...us.net]
> Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2015 11:47 PM
> To: Chen, Yu C
> Cc: Wysocki, Rafael J; tglx@...utronix.de; hpa@...or.com; bp@...en8.de;
> Zhang, Rui; linux-pm@...r.kernel.org; x86@...nel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Brown, Len; 'Ingo Molnar'; 'Pavel Machek'; 'Kristen
> Carlson Accardi'; Doug Smythies
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] [v4] x86, suspend: Save/restore extra MSR registers for
> suspend
>
> Hi Yu, thanks for your reply.
>
> On 2015.10.10 19:27 Chen, Yu C wrote:
> > On 2105.10.10 02:56 Doug Smythies wrote:
> >
> >>> The current version of the intel_pstate driver is incompatible with
> >>> any use of Clock Modulation, always resulting in driving the target
> >>> pstate to the minimum, regardless of load. The result is the
> >>> apparent CPU frequency stuck at minimum * modulation percent.
> >>
> >>> The acpi-cpufreq driver works fine with Clock Modulation, resulting
> >>> in desired frequency * modulation percent.
> >>
>
> > [Yu] Why intel_pstate driver is incompatible with Clock Modulation?
>
> It is simply how the current control algorithm responds to the scenario.
>
> The problem is in intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy, here:
>
> /*
> * core_busy is the ratio of actual performance to max
> * max_pstate is the max non turbo pstate available
> * current_pstate was the pstate that was requested during
> * the last sample period.
> *
> * We normalize core_busy, which was our actual percent
> * performance to what we requested during the last sample
> * period. The result will be a percentage of busy at a
> * specified pstate.
> */
> core_busy = cpu->sample.core_pct_busy;
> max_pstate = int_tofp(cpu->pstate.max_pstate);
> current_pstate = int_tofp(cpu->pstate.current_pstate);
> core_busy = mul_fp(core_busy, div_fp(max_pstate, current_pstate));
>
> With Clock Modulation enabled, the actual performance percent will always
> be less than what was asked for, basically meaning current_pstate is much
> less than what was asked for. Thus the algorithm will drive down the target
> pstate regardless of load.
>
[Yu] Do you mean, there is some problem with the normalization,and we should use
the actual pstate rather than the theoretical current_pstate, for example,
the pseudocode might looked like:
- current_pstate = int_tofp(cpu->pstate.current_pstate);
+ current_pstate = int_tofp(cpu->pstate.current_pstat)*0.85;
Best Regards,
Yu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists