[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <563715A4.5030400@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 08:49:56 +0100
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Tina Ruchandani <ruchandani.tina@...il.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
y2038@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3] scsi: stex: Remove use of struct timeval
On 10/30/2015 01:45 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 30 October 2015 12:58:33 Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>> @@ -1076,7 +1069,7 @@ static int stex_ss_handshake(struct st_hba *hba)
>>> h->req_cnt = cpu_to_le16(hba->rq_count+1);
>>> h->status_sz = cpu_to_le16(sizeof(struct status_msg));
>>> h->status_cnt = cpu_to_le16(hba->sts_count+1);
>>> - stex_gettime(&h->hosttime);
>>> + h->hosttime = cpu_to_le64(ktime_get_real_seconds());
>>> h->partner_type = HMU_PARTNER_TYPE;
>>> h->extra_offset = h->extra_size = 0;
>>> scratch_size = (hba->sts_count+1)*sizeof(u32);
>>>
>> Just remove 'hosttime' altogether. It serves no purpose whatsoever.
>>
>>
>
> Are you sure? It is defined in a struct that is shared with the HBA
> as part of hba->dma_mem, so unless you have access to the firmware,
> it's hard to guess what it might be used for inside of the firmware.
>
Ah, you're right. Okay, so we'll need to convert it.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists