linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] drivers/rtc/rtc-s5m.c: add support for S2MPS15 RTC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151102101931.GK22331@piout.net>
Date:	Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:19:31 +0100
From:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, broonie@...nel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] drivers/rtc/rtc-s5m.c: add support for S2MPS15 RTC

On 02/11/2015 at 09:03:59 +0000, Lee Jones wrote :
> > > I think you cannot apply it directly because it depends on headers from
> > > patch 2/4. It won't build.
> > > 
> > 
> > Yeah, this depends on the mfd tree. I don't thin Lee applied patch 2/4
> > yet so I'm taking that one for 4.5.
> 
> I don't mind if you take it, but if you do so you need to take the
> Regulator patch as well AND provide Mark and I a pull-request from an
> immutable branch please. 
> 

Actually, I was thinking that you would take 2/4 through your tree and I
would either base myself on that or delay the patch for 4.5. You could
also take the rtc patch if you plan to apply 2/4, feel free to add my
acked-by.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/