linux-kernel - Re: WARNING in task_participate_group

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:13:33 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc:	Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, amanieu@...il.com,
	pmoore@...hat.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	vdavydov@...allels.com, qiaowei.ren@...el.com, dave@...olabs.net,
	palmer@...belt.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
	Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: WARNING in task_participate_group_stop

Hi Dmitry,

On 11/02, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/signal.c:334
> task_participate_group_stop+0x157/0x1d0()
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 4.3.0 #48
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
>  ffffffff82e40280 ffff88003eb0fae0 ffffffff819efe55 0000000000000000
>  ffff88003eb0fb20 ffffffff810ec871 ffffffff8110f4d7 ffff88003eb00000
>  ffff88003eb20000 0000000000000000 ffff88003eb0fbf8 ffff88003eb20000
> Call Trace:
>  [<ffffffff810eca35>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x20 kernel/panic.c:480
>  [<ffffffff8110f4d7>] task_participate_group_stop+0x157/0x1d0
> kernel/signal.c:334
>  [<ffffffff81113587>] do_signal_stop+0x1e7/0x6e0 kernel/signal.c:2060
>  [<ffffffff81116ab7>] get_signal+0x387/0x11b0 kernel/signal.c:2316
>  [<ffffffff8100cf0d>] do_signal+0x8d/0x19e0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:707
>  [<ffffffff81005d8d>] prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x11d/0x170
> arch/x86/entry/common.c:251
>  [<ffffffff81005e83>] syscall_return_slowpath+0xa3/0x2b0
> arch/x86/entry/common.c:317
>  [<ffffffff82d4f6a7>] int_ret_from_sys_call+0x25/0x8f
> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:281
> ---[ end trace f6697fd630b7c361 ]---
>
>
> The reproducer is (needs to be run as root):
>
> // autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller)
> #include <sys/ptrace.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
>
> int main()
> {
>     int pid = 1;
>     ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, pid, 0, 0);
>     ptrace(PTRACE_SETOPTIONS, pid, 0, PTRACE_O_EXITKILL);
>     sleep(1);
>     return 0;
> }

Thanks.

Can't reproduce, but at first glance the problem looks clear...

> Yes, it is weird and it kills init right afterwards.

Could you confirm that this WARN_ON() happens _after_ the reproducer exits?

> But I wasn't able
> to figure out what's the root cause (why task does not have
> JOBCTL_STOP_PENDING) and maybe the same WARNING can be triggered
> without root and/or with other than init process. So still posting it
> here.

Yes I think you are right. SIGSTOP can race with SIGKILL which (unlike SIGCONT)
doesn't clear JOBCTL_STOP_DEQUEUED/PENDING/etc.

This is mostly fine, the task won't block in TASK_STOPPED if SIGKILL is pending,
but still is not right and leads to the warning above: JOBCTL_STOP_PENDING was not
set because do_signal_stop()->task_set_jobctl_pending() checks fatal_signal_pending().

Probably the patch below should fix the problem, but I'd like to think more before
I send the fix.

Oleg.

--- x/kernel/signal.c
+++ x/kernel/signal.c
@@ -2002,7 +2002,7 @@ static bool do_signal_stop(int signr)
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(signr & ~JOBCTL_STOP_SIGMASK);
 
 		if (!likely(current->jobctl & JOBCTL_STOP_DEQUEUED) ||
-		    unlikely(signal_group_exit(sig)))
+		    unlikely(fatal_signal_pending(current)))
 			return false;
 		/*
 		 * There is no group stop already in progress.  We must

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/