[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151102105113.72aade85@xhacker>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 10:51:13 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
CC: <tglx@...utronix.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: dw_apb_timer_of: support timer-based delay
Dear Daniel,
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 13:37:01 +0100
Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 10/30/2015 12:09 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > Dear Daniel,
> >
> > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:44:46 +0100
> > Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@....> wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/30/2015 09:27 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >>> Implement an ARM delay timer to be used for udelay(). This allows us to
> >>> skip the delay loop calibration at boot on Marvell BG2, BG2Q, BG2CD
> >>> platforms. And after this patch, udelay() will be unaffected by CPU
> >>> frequency changes.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/clocksource/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
> >>> drivers/clocksource/dw_apb_timer_of.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >>> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> >>> index a7726db..7b081805 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> >>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> >>> @@ -29,6 +29,16 @@ config DW_APB_TIMER_OF
> >>> select DW_APB_TIMER
> >>> select CLKSRC_OF
> >>>
> >>> +config DW_APB_TIMER_BASED_DELAY
> >>> + bool "DW APB timer based delay"
> >>> + depends on ARM && DW_APB_TIMER_OF
> >>> + default n
> >>> + help
> >>> + This option enables support for using the DW APB timer to
> >>> + implement timer-based delay. It is useful for skiping the
> >>> + delay loop calibration at boot on some platforms. And the
> >>> + udelay() will be unaffected by CPU frequency changes.
> >>> +
> >>
> >> Why do you want it to be optional ?
> >>
> >
> > Because in some platforms which has arm arch timer, this dw apb timer
> > delay isn't needed, the arch timer is better. So we want it be optional
> > so that the platforms which need this feature select it manually when config
> > the kernel.
>
> Correct me if I am wrong. If you have the arch timer, you don't need the
Yes, I don't need the dw apb timer if we have arch timer,
> dw apb timer at all, no ? So the selection would be arch arm timer *or*
> dw_apb_timer ? not arch_arm_timer for delay and dw_apb_timer for
> clockevents, right ?
Yes, if we have arch timer, I prefer to use it for clockevent and delay.
Could you please provide suggestion how to handle this case?
Thanks,
Jisheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists