[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151102151050.GA3036@ketchup.mtl.sfl>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 10:10:50 -0500
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: assert SMI lock
Hi Andrew,
On Nov. Monday 02 (45) 04:02 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 06:56:45PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> > It's easy to forget to lock the smi_mutex before calling the low-level
> > _mv88e6xxx_reg_{read,write}, so add a assert_smi_lock function in them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
>
> Acked-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>
>
> Since there is no followup fixes patch, i assume we actually have it
> correct at the moment?
Yes, this v2 contains the 2 fixups you mentioned (removing the inline
keyword and keep the dsa_host_dev_to_mii_bus call as is). Thus this
version is correct.
Thanks,
-v
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists