[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJ5tyQ11b5p=xigJwD2stPuqk7akJBhNU-NR6sov5uCiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 09:13:17 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM / OPP: Add "opp-supported-hw" binding
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 30-10-15, 15:18, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> A side-note. I wonder if it would be better style to have the
>> node name be:
>>
>> opp@...000000 {
>
> I thought the @... had a special meaning and we might end up creating
> some device for the node then? Perhaps I am mistaken.
There is no special meaning, just convention which is the unit-address
should match the reg property address. I'm okay with an exception
here.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists