[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5093304.EN6Bc2EjLr@wuerfel>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 16:33:27 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
john.stultz@...aro.org, Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/22] clocksource/drivers/rockchip: Make the driver more compatible
On Monday 02 November 2015 13:56:31 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> static inline void rk_timer_disable(struct clock_event_device *ce)
> {
> writel_relaxed(TIMER_DISABLE, rk_base(ce) + TIMER_CONTROL_REG);
> - dsb();
> + dsb(sy);
> }
>
> static inline void rk_timer_enable(struct clock_event_device *ce, u32 flags)
> {
> writel_relaxed(TIMER_ENABLE | TIMER_INT_UNMASK | flags,
> rk_base(ce) + TIMER_CONTROL_REG);
> - dsb();
> + dsb(sy);
> }
>
>
This will fail the compile test, because dsb() is not available on non-ARM
architectures. Would it be enough to just use the normal writel() accessor
here?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists