[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1446481847.3442.61.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:30:47 +0100
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar.rs@...sung.com>,
YH Huang <yh.huang@...iatek.com>,
Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm-backlight: Avoid backlight flicker when probed from
DT
Hi Lee,
Am Freitag, den 30.10.2015, 18:21 +0000 schrieb Lee Jones:
> > @@ -264,12 +266,32 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > pb->enable_gpio = gpio_to_desc(data->enable_gpio);
> > }
> >
> > + phandle = of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "phandle", NULL) != NULL;
>
> This is a little ugly.
>
> If this is the only way to identify the probedness of a device then
> you probably want to neaten it up a little. I suggest something along
> the lines of:
>
> if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "phandle", NULL))
> already_probed = true;
>
> Also, do you also want to check for "linux,phandle", as this is always
> catered for in drivers/of/*
Thanks for pointing this out. I suppose I should just check
pdev->dev.of_node->phandle != 0 instead. That will already be
initialized by unflatten_dt_node if either property was found.
regards
Philipp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists