[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201511030152.JGF95845.SHVLOMtOJFFOFQ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 01:52:13 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: cl@...ux.com
Cc: htejun@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org, mgorman@...e.de
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] vmstat: Create our own workqueue
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2015, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>
> > Then, you need to update below description (or drop it) because
> > patch 3/3 alone will not guarantee that the counters are up to date.
>
> The vmstat system does not guarantee that the counters are up to date
> always. The whole point is the deferral of updates for performance
> reasons. They are updated *at some point* within stat_interval. That needs
> to happen and that is what this patchset is fixing.
>
I'm still unclear. I think that the result of this patchset is
The counters are never updated even after stat_interval
if some workqueue item is doing a __GFP_WAIT memory allocation.
but the patch description sounds as if
The counters will be updated even if some workqueue item is
doing a __GFP_WAIT memory allocation.
which denies the actual result I tested with this patchset applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists