linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 4/7] staging: lustre: use proper comment blocks for libcfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon,  2 Nov 2015 12:22:10 -0500
From:	James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org,
	James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/7] staging: lustre: use proper comment blocks for libcfs_hash.h

The script checkpatch.pl reported problems with the style of
the comment blocks. This patch resolves those problems.

Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
---
 .../lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_hash.h      |   21 +++++++++++++------
 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_hash.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_hash.h
index 2e0c892..87dee16 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_hash.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_hash.h
@@ -61,8 +61,10 @@
 
 /** disable debug */
 #define CFS_HASH_DEBUG_NONE	0
-/** record hash depth and output to console when it's too deep,
- *  computing overhead is low but consume more memory */
+/*
+ * record hash depth and output to console when it's too deep,
+ * computing overhead is low but consume more memory
+ */
 #define CFS_HASH_DEBUG_1	1
 /** expensive, check key validation */
 #define CFS_HASH_DEBUG_2	2
@@ -158,7 +160,8 @@ enum cfs_hash_tag {
 	 */
 	CFS_HASH_NBLK_CHANGE	= 1 << 13,
 	/** NB, we typed hs_flags as  __u16, please change it
-	 * if you need to extend >=16 flags */
+	 * if you need to extend >=16 flags
+	 */
 };
 
 /** most used attributes */
@@ -205,8 +208,10 @@ enum cfs_hash_tag {
  */
 
 struct cfs_hash {
-	/** serialize with rehash, or serialize all operations if
-	 * the hash-table has CFS_HASH_NO_BKTLOCK */
+	/*
+	 * serialize with rehash, or serialize all operations if
+	 * the hash-table has CFS_HASH_NO_BKTLOCK
+	 */
 	union cfs_hash_lock		hs_lock;
 	/** hash operations */
 	struct cfs_hash_ops		*hs_ops;
@@ -373,9 +378,11 @@ cfs_hash_with_add_tail(struct cfs_hash *hs)
 static inline int
 cfs_hash_with_no_itemref(struct cfs_hash *hs)
 {
-	/* hash-table doesn't keep refcount on item,
+	/*
+	 * hash-table doesn't keep refcount on item,
 	 * item can't be removed from hash unless it's
-	 * ZERO refcount */
+	 * ZERO refcount.
+	 */
 	return (hs->hs_flags & CFS_HASH_NO_ITEMREF) != 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/