lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:21:44 -0800 From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, robh+dt@...nel.org, lee.jones@...aro.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, mark.rutland@....com, pawel.moll@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org, nm@...com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM / OPP: Add "opp-supported-hw" binding On 10/31, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 30-10-15, 14:49, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > I suppose if you wanted to have 64 possible combinations of some > > attribute you would just extend it to two 32 bit numbers in > > sequence? I don't see the limitation here, and hopefully there > > isn't a limitation so that we can specify sufficiently large > > numbers with more bits if we need to. > > Yeah, we discussed this earlier when Lee had the same query and I > suggested the exact same thing to him then. > Ah I see that after looking at the previous thread. Perhaps we can add such information into the documentation so that people aren't misled into thinking they're limited to 32 bits? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists