[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJChOdfRaV30mT=7-cN_9-aEdkwQHs7ONtwbySTYn2Y3jHtFmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 15:32:51 -0500
From: Robert Sesek <rsesek@...gle.com>
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: Be more precise with syscall arguments.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:
> On 11/02/2015 12:49 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Robert Sesek <rsesek@...gle.com> wrote:
>>> Certain syscall emulation layers strictly check that the number of
>>> arguments match what the syscall handler expects. The KILL_one_arg_one and
>>> KILL_one_arg_six tests passed more parameters than expected to various
>>> syscalls, causing failures in this emulation mode. Instead, test using
>>> syscalls that take the appropriate number of arguments.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Robert Sesek <rsesek@...gle.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>>
>> Looks great, thanks!
>>
>> Shuah, can you take this into the selftests tree?
>>
>
> Robert,
>
> Could you please send this patch to me. It didn't make to
> my Inbox.
>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
Sure. I have re-mailed you the patch directly. It's also available here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7537891/
Thanks,
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists