[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151102210001.GB7274@google.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 13:00:01 -0800
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
Josh Wu <josh.wu@...el.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Han Xu <han.xu@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] mtd: nand: drop unnecessary partition parser
data
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:32:37PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 20:33:25 -0700
> Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com> wrote:
>
[...]
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
> > index dcb1f7f4873f..850546dc98c8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
> > @@ -748,6 +748,7 @@ static int fsl_elbc_chip_init(struct fsl_elbc_mtd *priv)
> > /* Fill in fsl_elbc_mtd structure */
> > priv->mtd.priv = chip;
> > priv->mtd.dev.parent = priv->dev;
> > + chip->flash_node = priv->dev->of_node;
>
> Shouldn't we use the nand_set_flash_node() helper here? Here is a diff replacing
> all 'chip->flash_node =' occurrences by nand_set_flash_node():
Hmm, I don't know why I overlooked those. I think maybe I did the
initial replacement before this patch and forgot to do the same
replacement on my subsequent work. I guess that's what happens when I
rebase/rework too much...
Thanks for the diff. I'll probably squash it into v3 if/when that comes.
Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists