[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJvTdKnagWXhA2sFD79fAx4oudrZ5CSPDFPt+g=+FTLHq27ncA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 00:16:55 -0500
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: shrybman <shrybman@...savvy.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
dparsons@...ghtdsl.net, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86 smpboot: fix cpu_init_udelay=10000
> Is this really what you intended? The else is commented out so if init_udelay is quirked
> to be 0 it will always be reset to UDELAY_10MS_DEFAULT. Also init_udelay is unsigned, so
> would UINT_MAX be a better choice?
Hi Shane,
Thanks for pointing out this flaw.
Seems it will make 4.3 10ms slower than 4.2 on these boxes, by default.
We'll send an incremental patch for 4.4.
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists