[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <563805CE.8000904@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 09:54:38 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: john.stultz@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
"moderated list:ARM SUB-ARCHITECT..."
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNO..."
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/22] clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Fix Kconfig and add
COMPILE_TEST option
Hi,
On 2015년 11월 02일 21:56, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Let the platform's Kconfig to select the clock instead of having a reverse
> dependency from the driver to the platform options.
>
> Add the COMPILE_TEST option for the compilation test coverage. Due to the
> non portable 'delay' code, this driver is only compilable on ARM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/clocksource/Kconfig | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
> index 3a10f1a..ff10539 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ menuconfig ARCH_EXYNOS
> select SRAM
> select THERMAL
> select MFD_SYSCON
> + select CLKSRC_EXYNOS_MCT
> help
> Support for SAMSUNG EXYNOS SoCs (EXYNOS4/5)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> index 916c36d..d829cbe 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> @@ -213,8 +213,8 @@ config CLKSRC_METAG_GENERIC
> This option enables support for the Meta per-thread timers.
>
> config CLKSRC_EXYNOS_MCT
> - def_bool y if ARCH_EXYNOS
> - depends on !ARM64
> + bool "Exynos multi core timer driver" if COMPILE_TEST
> + depends on ARM
> help
> Support for Multi Core Timer controller on Exynos SoCs.
>
>
Looks good to me. As you commented, delay_timer is only used on ARM 32bit.
I'm glad to use the 'depends on ARM' instead of reverse dependency.
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists