[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1446564061-3379-5-git-send-email-uobergfe@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 16:21:01 +0100
From: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dzickus@...hat.com, atomlin@...hat.com,
uobergfe@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] watchdog: fix race between proc_watchdog_thresh() and watchdog_timer_fn()
Theoretically it is possible that the watchdog timer expires
right at the time when a user sets 'watchdog_thresh' to zero
(note: this disables the lockup detectors). In this scenario,
the is_softlockup() function - which is called by the timer -
could produce a false positive.
Fix this by checking the current value of 'watchdog_thresh'.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@...hat.com>
---
kernel/watchdog.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
index 84c4744..18f34cf 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ static int is_softlockup(unsigned long touch_ts)
{
unsigned long now = get_timestamp();
- if (watchdog_enabled & SOFT_WATCHDOG_ENABLED) {
+ if ((watchdog_enabled & SOFT_WATCHDOG_ENABLED) && watchdog_thresh){
/* Warn about unreasonable delays. */
if (time_after(now, touch_ts + get_softlockup_thresh()))
return now - touch_ts;
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists