[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151103160800.GD12910@localhost>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 21:38:00 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
timur@...eaurora.org, cov@...eaurora.org, jcm@...hat.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] dmaselftest: add memcpy selftest support functions
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 10:22:25AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 11:18:37PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> >>> On 11/2/2015 11:15 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> >>> >On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 01:07:38AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>
>
> >>> This one; on the other hand, is selftest to verify hardware is
> >>> working as expected during power up.
>
> I prefer to have such nice case by run time parameter (let's say
> common to all DMA Engine drivers)
>
> >> We can have common code which is used for dmatest as well as selftest. I do
> >> not want to see same code duplicated..
>
> First thought was to merge this to dmatest, however, some DMA
> controllers doesn't have a memcpy capability.
The tests should be based on capablity of memcpy
> How would we test them?
That part is tricky, you need to do so thru clients, spi/audio/serial etc
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists