linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] net: dsa: mv88e6060: cleanup and fix setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5638E06E.8010405@baylibre.com>
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 2015 17:27:26 +0100
From:	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
To:	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] net: dsa: mv88e6060: cleanup and fix
 setup

On 11/02/2015 04:41 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Hi Neil,
> 
> Nice cleanup. I'll just be a bit picky here, so you may not consider my
> comment for this patchset, but maybe for the future ones. Unless I'm
> mistaken, there is no reason to group all these patches together.
> 
> The first 4 patches are independent fixes, and thus could have been sent
> separately to netdev -net.
> 
> Then the last 2 ones could have been squashed together, because I don't
> see a real value to seperate them since you duplicate some defines, e.g.
> REG_PORT. And this patch would be a candidate for netdev -net-next.
> 
> Thanks,
> -v
> 
Hi Vivien,

I understand your point of view, and it really makes sense.

But the first patch has a dependency on the DSA cleanup patchset, so
if I follow your point, I should submit 3 patchsets with a single
patchset for the poll_link complete removal. But the two other
patchsets will have a strong dependency on the poll_link removal...

This question is on which version of mv88e6060 and dsa should I base
the cleanup patchset ? before of after the poll_link removal ?

For the fixes, they are not critical at all, net-next would be enough.

Any advice is welcome at this point....

Thanks !

Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/